@ d149729398750b98c0af14eb82c78cfe92750796Included summaries Content and scope, not a quality or risk grade
| Record or summary | This report |
|---|---|
| Measurement summary | Included |
| Repeat-check summary | Included · 2 / 2 matching measurement payloads reported |
| Same-artifact control summary | Included · 2 / 2 comparisons produced no finding |
| Underlying records | Retained in the VG1 archive; not included in this copy |
| Operational receipt | Not included · unsigned review copy |
| Statistical noise envelope | Not certified |
Repeat and control details
What this means for you
How the finding was decided
The reported internal finding uses the fixed, thresholded decision rule recorded for mv-1.4; it is not a test for any non-zero floating-point value. This rule is not, by itself, a measured noise floor for this model.
Text output is evaluated separately under exact greedy token-sequence comparison. The outcome is on the fixed input set, not a population rate or a capability score.
Structural coverage: 24 contributing probes per evaluated position. This is neither the number of output continuations nor a count of independent tasks.
Verify view
This view includes the decision, output status, available verification evidence and context. The finding and output-text status are unchanged; this version makes no statement about internal position.
What A and B represent
A is the source model. B is a partial in-memory block-weight simulation of that same model. B has no separate repository revision or deployable file.
The result describes this simulation only. It cannot establish the memory use, latency, task quality or numerical behavior of a packed inference implementation.
Recommended next checks Guidance, not a measurement
- Choose the actual candidateSelect the exact deployable quantized artifact and its inference implementation; retain the source revision with the comparison record.
- Check the customer workloadCompare source and deployed candidate on your own prompts. Record answer quality, formatting, latency and memory separately.
- Confirm the deployed changeRequest a direct before/after scan of the supported deployed artifact. A simulation result does not transfer automatically to that artifact.
Provenance and record
No operational receipt is included in this copy. No signing or deletion claim is made.
Recorded context
Pin these fields when you diff this report against a future scan. Matching context is a prerequisite for interpretation, not proof of the cause of a difference. These recorded public identities help identify the input artifacts. This review copy is unsigned; no customer verification receipt is attached.
| Run window (UTC) | 2026-09-08 11:06:37 UTC to 2026-09-08 11:17:30 UTC |
| Model reference | Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B |
| Artifact evidence | Artifact-identity and measurement records are preserved in the VG1 archive; this HTML contains no model weights |
| HF revision | A: d149729398750b98c0af14eb82c78cfe92750796 · B: derived simulation from A; no separate repository revision |
| Probe set / scan config | ps-1.1 / sc-1.0 |
| Simulation version | qsim-2.0 · in-memory simulation; the deployed artifact was not scanned |
| Reference set | no release reference set; estimator validation pending |
| Report schema | rs-1.7 |
| Compute isolation | managed compute; infrastructure identity is withheld |
| Runtime envelope | fixed release configuration; bitwise equality across device types is not guaranteed |
Reading this report alongside another scan
Check the artifact pair, revisions and measurement contract first. The categorical findings describe each recorded comparison; they do not rank different models. A different contract or execution environment needs its own comparability evidence. No numerical severity score is supplied.
Use as a checkpoint reference
For supported checkpoint comparisons, retain the starting revision, this measurement contract and the output settings with your training record. Compare the next checkpoint against that same reference, then retain its task results alongside the scan.
| For the next checkpoint | Record alongside this scan |
|---|---|
| Reference and candidate | Exact repository revisions |
| Comparable measurement | Same instrument, input contract and approved execution profile |
| Training change | Your fine-tune, merge or pruning record |
| Adoption decision | Your task acceptance results and deployment revision |
A reference record supports change tracking. It does not define an optimal model or a target score for training. Simulation results describe the simulated state; actual checkpoint changes require their own before/after comparison.
Your findings and the protected instrument
The observation, output-text status, artifact context and, where applicable, metadata comparison, plus provenance and categorical depth detail when included.
Raw profiles, per-item records, probe construction, thresholds, transformations and internal traces. The report contains no model weights, credentials or infrastructure identifiers.
This is an in-memory simulation, not a packed kernel or a scan of a deployed quantized artifact. This descriptive result does not identify cause, capability, quality, safety or deployment impact. It is not a task-quality measurement. Do not target a layer or make a shipping decision from this report alone. No calibrated risk or pass/fail grade is assigned. No cross-model ranking or cross-device bitwise-equality claim is made.
Historical results under superseded estimators do not validate this release. The categorical depth view, when included, describes recorded responses; it is not a diagnosis of edited weights.